Getting Excited Is Just The First Step

Picture 4

So many people write about the solutions they’ve found and the things they’ve discovered. I rarely see people write about they problems they are confronting, the different factors they are weighing, the sacrifices they are making and ultimately how they decide. We hear success stories all the time, that follow a traditional story arc: at first he didn’t know what to do, then he got an idea, but the challenge seemed too daunting and he thought about giving up, but he persevered and made it happen. You can do it, too! And then they run off a list of traits that they think allowed them to succeed. But those lists are most of the time emotional feel good junk food. They make us feel good, pump us up and let us know that it is possible for us to enjoy that success as well. But pumping someone up and not giving them good options about how to proceed is very dangerous. It’s deceptive to credit success with tips that hint at the process that underly it without providing enough awareness of the real ingredients. It is the process that unlocks that potential to replicate results.

I’m not saying these are bad, it’s good to share your story and I don’t know how much more can be accomplished in the time speeches like these are given, except for the emphasis on the hard work needed, and on pointing to resources that allow the inspired to learn more in depth about the process of building a strong foundation for success. I don’t know many of organizations that really prepare young people holistically for success. School certainly doesn’t teach you how to be successful. It teaches you socialization and a narrow band of academic knowledge. Being more transparent about your process will give other people the opportunity to guide you in the right direction through offering advice, point to resources and opening up opportunities. That’s the approach I’ve taken, I had no idea how to get Force For the Future started. So I took my ambitious ideas for a project and learned how to get lunch and coffee meetings with people who could give me the feedback and point me to the resources necessary to begin down an entrepreneurial road. I picked their brains and told them about my problems and got advice about how to succeed and now I have a network of friends and advisors who I can rely on for almost any problem I have.

Getting pumped up is necessary but being told something is possible without being told how is like telling a kid there’s candy hidden somewhere in a one hundred room mansion. He’ll be excited at first and run around looking for it. But then he’ll give up after while, frustrated. And maybe his eyes will light up again when he’s reminded tomorrow that there’s still candy somewhere in the mansion. But his enthusiasm will soon fade and his expectations will lower next time you bring it up. And he won’t ever find the candy because he was only told of it’s existence he wasn’t told anything about how to find it. And that’s how most people start to feel about success: like a helpless kid who just doesn’t want to be messed with anymore. He’d rather sit and suck his thumb than get his hopes up again only to be disappointed.

We need better structures to support those with the desire to do something big to actually make it happen. This is an incredibly important problem to solve. We need more young people on a trajectory towards solving today’s big issues and providing the resources, support structure and education for them to do that is the difference between resigning to dispassionate ‘pay the bills’ work or an insatiable entrepreneurial drive to improve humanity. This is a problem that I think is very surmountable and am working with some great people on some solutions right now.

Share on Twitter

Notes on Wisdom

318367903_8cbdc99d38

On Thursday night I was having dinner with friends and we discussed the topic of Wisdom. What it means, and who has it.

I thought I’d share some of our ideas.
In order to have wisdom you need to have had some success. You can’t have failed all the time. Some success is better than all failure.
Mixed consensus on whether to a hire a CEO who has failed twice or one who has succeeded twice.
But having experienced both success and failure is best. Probably the best combo is success – failure – success.

Wisdom requires being articulate and being able to express what you have learned, though this can be done without out words.

Judging the wisdom of an individual has elements of trajectory and their wisdom relative to other’s their age is an important factor as well.

Wisdom about very narrow topics i.e. virality isn’t really wisdom, it’s expertise. Wisdom is about life. A wise person thinks about what it means to have a good life.

A 55 year old is often a wiser than a 75 year old. In general, this is largely due to the emotional baggage and bitterness of those in old age. An important marker signifying when someone’s wisdom begins to decline is when they begin to feel their own mortality and start thinking about death.

Thinking about death could cause some to focus on what’s important in life, but if they weren’t focusing on what’s important in life before they thought about death, how wise were they really?
Wise people focus on what’s important and are still looking to grow. No longer looking for growth is one of the causes of declining wisdom.

Older people who realize their years are limited are often focused on maintenance rather than growth. Seeking growth is essential for wisdom. A wise person has to understand there’s always room to grow. Some would conjure up images of the old Japanese man in the tea garden who is it all figured out, but I don’t think any wise person can profess to have anything all figured out. Perhaps they have mastered certain principles and can share those with confidence and certainty. But there’s always room for improvement and life is a never ending journey in pursuit of growth.

Share on Twitter

Lessons from Sports: Focusing On The Right Things

Picture 3

I’ve written about sports frequently because I think the lessons are incredibly transferable. Athletics are extremely competitive with a long history of results-oriented focus. It’s a huge business, with a lot of attention, money and science aimed at maximizing results. While transferring lessons from a game can be dangerous, because any game is an over simplification of the complexity of the real world,  closed environments are great testing grounds for honing narrow theories, skills and practices.

During Halftime of the NBA Finals there was a great segment where Dwight Howard, a future great, was spending time learning from Bill Russel, the greatest winner of all time — 11 championships.  Michael Wilbon talked about the importance of listening and its tendency to be underrated. Wilbon praised Howard’s willingness to listen to Bill Russell.

They were discussing how you become great and Russell told Howard that when the season ended he should take a month off and not even look at a basketball. This violated Howard’s worldview — “That’s time others could be working,” he replied incredulous.  Intuition says Howard is right: maximize time working. But I’m inclined to trust the greatest winner of all time. It fits with the current paradigm of the productivity-obsessed that the correct paradigm is to focus on energy management not time management.

High achievers who strive to be the best seem to undervalue the long term benefit of taking time off. Growth requires focus and intensity and you simply can’t do that 24/7/365. Stepping away, recharging, and revitalizing is crucial for long term growth. And think long term growth whenever possible.

Jeff Van Gundy made another astute point on a common error most people make. Van Gundy was addressing criticism other people had of Kobe Byrant, that he should shoot more or pass more. Van Gundy said focusing on passing more or shooting more was flat out wrong. Instead he said, just focus on making the right decision. Let the situation dictate your decision making. If they go single coverage go 1 on 1, if they try and double team, find the open man. This lesson struck me as very universal. So many times we can get zeroed on doing something regardless of the situation, like deciding we should pass more or shoot more. Instead focus on the right thing: being flexible, assessing the situation and adapting. “Mind like Water” as they say.

If you’re trying to write a popular blog don’t focus on the wrong metrics like “driving more traffic” to your site. Instead focus on better content first. If you’re in a conversation with someone important or beautiful and you’re nervous, don’t focus on saying the perfect thing instead just focus on having 100% belief in what ever comes to mind. If you’re trying to get the ear of someone who is incredibly busy and you see them at an event, don’t make a pact that you’re going to get him to help you no matter what, instead if you do enter in conversation just go with the flow, make a good impression and follow up later.


Share on Twitter

The Coming Educational Landscape Pt. 2

First I recommend you read the previous post on this subject.

Concurrently to that facebook discussion I was having this discussion over Instant Messenger as a result of this tweet: Hypothesis: Future of education is the structure of unschooling combined with resources of a Harvard/Stanford. What do you think?

Cory

i find ur stastus interesting

do u mean something like an online school?

11:40am

Max

well I think that’s one model, but it’s not sufficient, face to face is still very important for learning

I’m thinking something more decentralized but in a local area

11:42am

Cory

so essentially there are still “schools”

but every school has resources like harvard

?

11:43am

Max

hm, I don’t know if that’s possible, one school will always have more resources. I suppose every school could have what harvard has now, if harvard then had even more…11:45am

Max

but more specifically, what I’m proposing, is that the structure of unschooling combined with resources comparable to that of Harvard is better than what Harvard currently provides. This would create more engaged, and effective people

11:46am

Cory

hm

i like your goal for sure

11:48am

Max

And I think many colleges could provide more value by adopting that model, instead of trying to emulate harvard

I sense a ‘but’

11:49am

Cory

i cant say but yet, cuz im not totally sure what a more local education would be like

11:49am

Max

I”m actually working on this btw, I’m taking a gap year and working on a startup that aims to foster this , by allowing more young people to actually make big ideas happen, instead of it just being momentary enthusiastic and losing interest.

Entrepreneurship and startups give you the early signal of what it will look like

21st century demands being entrepreneurial in my opinion, that doesn’t necessarily mean starting a business though.

11:51am

Max

ex: Preben Antonsen, close friend who went to Lick, wants to get todays youth more into classical music, so as part of “Formerly known as classical” he organized a concert. That’s entrepreneurial, it’s making things happen and it’s way more empowering than anything that happens in the classroom.

11:55am

Cory

another great idea

you always appear on my newsfeed

and sadly

no one else is really enthusiastic or about the world or engaged

Continue reading

Share on Twitter

The Coming Educational Landscape Pt. 1

Earlier this morning I posted this statement on twitter: Hypothesis: Future of education is the structure of unschooling combined with resources of a Harvard/Stanford. What do you think?

Almost immediately engaged conversation began in number of places. I wanted to share that discussion in a more open space. (Here is part 2)

Below is our facebook conversation lightly edited and separated into clearer threads.

Thomas Mamajama Mallon at 11:36am June 10

I think we’ll have a more fluid pricing model, i.e a cost more proportional to ranking, but unschooling will principally happen at the grammar/high-school level. I don’t think traditional college is going anywhere withing the next 2 decades.

Max Marmer at 11:42am June 10

Let’s say unschooling model I just proposed is competing with traditional college. What does traditional college do better?

Joseph P Jackson at 11:47am June 10

See weapons of Mass Instruction, Gatto’s newest book. Also see Tapscott’s recent article at Edge on the end of the University and Neil Gershenfeld’s interview in SEED on how the MIT model is obsolete. FAB lab networks, community techshops, etc being the future. On the contrary I think the University could die faster than the state coerced system. Tuition hit 50K per year for “4 yr liberal arts undergrad” even before the financial collapse. The credentialing function is dead as soon as Web 3.0, semantic web/blog/social software mining for reputation metrics comes online, est 10yrs.

Max Marmer at 11:59am June 10

A lot of good resources here.

1) Gatto: I will check it out. However I saw him speak at Future Salon last year and while he had a lot of good ideas, I wasn’t impressed with the coherence of a solution, though he was really good at delivering anecdotes that illustrated the problem. Did you read the book? Maybe that’s better.

2) I read Tapscott’s article, it was great.

3) I will check out Gershenfeld’s article. I’m a big fan of his and it’s my intention to involve the making community in Force For the Future. It was reading Fab four years ago that inspired me to go down this route. Digital Fab owns a significant part of 21st century learning landscape, I think. Not all of it though. There are some really key startup/entrepreneurial parts I’m working on.

Max Marmer at 11:59am June 10

4) Great answers on credentialling, that’s what I’ve been feeling, but that’s a great expanation of the tools that will actually take the system down. A degree is one, very antiquated way of signaling competency, but it’s much better to prove competency with the work you actually did. Project based learning is a way people can show they have real skills and can actually contribute, not just explain how it works on tests and papers.

It’s already not the most effective way to judge talent, if you’re willing to do research for 10-20 min online and see what a person is like and what they have done, and who they surround themselves with. Just 10-20 min isn’t scalable if you have 100+ people applying for a job.

Continue reading

Share on Twitter