My Speech at The World Future Society

Over the weekend I spoke at the World Future Society on a panel entitled “Youth Can Change the World”. I talked about how every young person can make an impact but that we need to change how we think about education in order to open up that possibility for more people.

The most difficult part of this process was getting this down to about 12 minutes in length. In the brainstorming phase I wrote over 8,500 words and organizing and cutting ideas was a big challenge, but I am pleased with the final result.

I enjoyed writing and giving the speech and hope to do more in the coming months and years. I will be iteratively adding and improving both the content and the slides of the presentation.

Here are my slides and the transcript of the speech. The video recording of the speech is now posted here.

Youth Changing the World By Making Education More Entrepreneurial

I’m here to tell you that every young person can change the world, and that our future depends on a collective attempt to do so.

Over the course of the last few years I’ve been deeply interested in the meaning of success in the 21st century at both an individual and societal level, focusing primarily on the role the educational system plays now and the role it should play in the future. I will describe a few changes the 21st century demands, a few of the failures of the current system and finally I’ll tell you a little bit about the startup organization I’m founding to implement these ideas about how to lower the barrier to entry for young people who want to make a difference in the world.

We are at a critical juncture for humanity. The world is facing some tremendous challenges: Radical Climate Change, looming water crisis, global pandemics, and billions desperately trying to rise out of poverty putting increasing strain on our depleting resources. These are big existential threats.

But this is also an extraordinary time because in this hyper-connected, technologically advanced world we also have more opportunity and more power to create the kind of future we want than ever before. Thinking about these problems is daunting, but if we are to find solutions it will come from unleashing the ingenuity of the next generation of young leaders.

We’ve got a generation of young people itching to get more involved and make a difference. A year ago, the Obama campaign harnessed that energy beautifully. We continue to get excited when we hear an inspirational speech or a call to action, and we exhibit unparalleled optimism about changing the world, but that enthusiasm begins to fade when we are forced to return to a school system that is outdated, constraining and depressing. There are so many dire problems to work on that there is no place for apathy yet many are trapped by it. Apathy is the result of an irrelevant educational system closing us out from the things we really care about.

Many young people are longing for something more meaningful in their education and work, and giving us a chance to engage with the big issues of our time could be the difference between resigning to dispassionate ‘pay the bills’ work and an insatiable entrepreneurial drive to improve humanity.

Why doesn’t our education system nurture the innovative spirit and leadership traits necessary for changemaking in the 21st century? Because it is a legacy of the industrial era that was designed to stamp these traits out.

The educational system was designed to train factory workers. And changes since have been incremental and on top of the same fundamentally outdated system. We are still all force fed the same handful of subjects that have been taught for years. And to succeed in the system requires obeying authority and coloring within the lines. Now, the system basically churns out intellectual factory workers, who are expected to be the cogs of large organizations, producing the same product for their lifetime in the work world. Today’s young people are great at analyzing narrow disciplines and writing 5 paragraph essays, yet we know little about ourselves and how to use our strengths to make an impact.

And so instead of having a large crop of these leaders needed for succeeding in the 21st century, we have students who hate school and think that’s what learning is. So they disengage and begin living weekend to weekend.

Succeeding in the 21st century requires flipping a number of educational practices on their head.

Instead of filling our heads with knowledge for 15 years, we should want to do something first, of tangible value to real world, and then learn the skills necessary to do it. Learning skills on an as needed basis fosters deeper understanding and greater motivation because it furthers a goal you care about. This also answers the ubiquitous question heard from students, “Why am I learning this?”

Instead of trying to optimize for the perfect balance of curriculum focus instead on what excites you and gets you really pumped up. The person who focuses on the pursuits that motivate and energize them will almost always be more successful than the person who tries to optimize for the best composition of knowledge, before even beginning to take action.

Focusing only on what excites you might make it seem like learning basic fundamentals would be avoided. Quite the contrary, as long as it furthers the bottom line: impact. As the great philosopher Frederich Nietzsche said, “He who has a strong enough why can bear almost any how.”

Instead of jumping into a standardized one size fits all education. You should cycle between divergent and convergent stages. In the divergent stage you’re being endlessly playful, trying to figure out what interests you. You do things like watch a few TED Talks, read a good book, watch a short documentary, prototype projects, talk with professionals in the field and share experiences with peers also on the journey of self discovery. By cycling between stages of exploration and focus you are certain to find topics that excite you and beckon you to dive deeper.

John Seely Brown former head of Xerox Parc has a quote I love that supports this approach, “Very often just going deeply into one or two topics that you really care about lets you appreciate the awe of the world … and once you learn to honor the mysteries of the world… you can expect always to need to keep probing. And so that sets the stage for lifelong inquiry.”

And if there is one thing a young person should achieve, it should be a passion for lifelong learning. Because any amount of learning you do in school pales in comparison to learning you’ll do throughout your life.

After you have found your passion act on it. The people who become most successful aren’t brilliant savants leagues ahead of their peers at 5 years old. Their secret lies in showing leadership and initiative at an early age, which opens up more opportunities and puts them on an accelerated path.

Everyone has a desire to matter, so when young people find their passion it will often be channeled towards making an impact. So by pursuing learning in roughly in this way we will have young people who are motivated lifelong learners who can contribute meaningfully to world.

A concept embodying the type of young person who approaches learning the way I just described is that of life entrepreneurship. It’s the idea that you seek out opportunities where you can make an impact and create a life uniquely suited to your strengths.  Life entrepreneurship is much broader than just starting businesses, it’s about consistently taking the initiative to improve your surroundings and advance your goals.

Entrepreneurship is also very flexible. We don’t remember most of what we we’re taught anyway, but you can always take the experience of making things happen with you. And come to any situation knowing you can find the problems and inefficiencies and solve them.

Entrepreneurial ventures also create an incredible amount of innovation and wealth out of almost nothing. At TED this year Juan Enriquez jolted us with an incredible fact: Investment in Startup companies represents .02% of US GDP but it represents 17.8% of US GDP output.  And that stat doesn’t even acknowledge burgeoning field of social entrepreneurship.

And now Introducing my startup Force For the Future… Force For the Future will bottle up this process, get more young people on this entrepreneurial path and accelerate the learning curve and impact by providing them with foresight, skills, connections and a support network of peers, mentors and organizations.

Basically this model boils down to unschooling but plus the resources of an institution like Harvard/Stanford.

It’s the idea that you will contribute the most by putting your time and energy into the things you are really passionate about. And aims to strike the optimal balance between being completely off on your own, where it’s easy to get lost and being part of a large system where you’re always told what to do.

Most fields in the 21st century are headed in a direction of decentralization and education is no different. Many of the pieces of 21st century learning landscape already exist, so one of Force For the Future’s primary functions will be acting as a liaison so that so a young person with desire can navigate through this entrepreneurial ecosystem and accelerate the process of turning an idea into a reality.

So much of achieving impact is about being connected with the right people. Force For the Future will connect you with the mentors who can make a big impact with a little time investment. We’ll connect you with the entrepreneurial veterans only a few years older who can dispel the illusion that making a big impact is not a dream but an achievable reality. And we’ll connect you with peers who are at a similar place on the rollercoaster ride that is life entrepreneurship.

If more young people get on a path to solving big problems, not only will we have happier, more fulfilled people, but we’ll have innovators who can lead us out of these economic and environmental crises and totally reinvent the world we live in…

I want to leave you with one final thought.

Margaret Mead once said,” Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”

What if it wasn’t just a small few who managed to escape the system and dared to change the world but we provided learning environments that allowed all young people partake in the creation of a world worth living in.

Share on Twitter

The Coming Educational Landscape Pt. 2

First I recommend you read the previous post on this subject.

Concurrently to that facebook discussion I was having this discussion over Instant Messenger as a result of this tweet: Hypothesis: Future of education is the structure of unschooling combined with resources of a Harvard/Stanford. What do you think?

Cory

i find ur stastus interesting

do u mean something like an online school?

11:40am

Max

well I think that’s one model, but it’s not sufficient, face to face is still very important for learning

I’m thinking something more decentralized but in a local area

11:42am

Cory

so essentially there are still “schools”

but every school has resources like harvard

?

11:43am

Max

hm, I don’t know if that’s possible, one school will always have more resources. I suppose every school could have what harvard has now, if harvard then had even more…11:45am

Max

but more specifically, what I’m proposing, is that the structure of unschooling combined with resources comparable to that of Harvard is better than what Harvard currently provides. This would create more engaged, and effective people

11:46am

Cory

hm

i like your goal for sure

11:48am

Max

And I think many colleges could provide more value by adopting that model, instead of trying to emulate harvard

I sense a ‘but’

11:49am

Cory

i cant say but yet, cuz im not totally sure what a more local education would be like

11:49am

Max

I”m actually working on this btw, I’m taking a gap year and working on a startup that aims to foster this , by allowing more young people to actually make big ideas happen, instead of it just being momentary enthusiastic and losing interest.

Entrepreneurship and startups give you the early signal of what it will look like

21st century demands being entrepreneurial in my opinion, that doesn’t necessarily mean starting a business though.

11:51am

Max

ex: Preben Antonsen, close friend who went to Lick, wants to get todays youth more into classical music, so as part of “Formerly known as classical” he organized a concert. That’s entrepreneurial, it’s making things happen and it’s way more empowering than anything that happens in the classroom.

11:55am

Cory

another great idea

you always appear on my newsfeed

and sadly

no one else is really enthusiastic or about the world or engaged

Continue reading

Share on Twitter

The Coming Educational Landscape Pt. 1

Earlier this morning I posted this statement on twitter: Hypothesis: Future of education is the structure of unschooling combined with resources of a Harvard/Stanford. What do you think?

Almost immediately engaged conversation began in number of places. I wanted to share that discussion in a more open space. (Here is part 2)

Below is our facebook conversation lightly edited and separated into clearer threads.

Thomas Mamajama Mallon at 11:36am June 10

I think we’ll have a more fluid pricing model, i.e a cost more proportional to ranking, but unschooling will principally happen at the grammar/high-school level. I don’t think traditional college is going anywhere withing the next 2 decades.

Max Marmer at 11:42am June 10

Let’s say unschooling model I just proposed is competing with traditional college. What does traditional college do better?

Joseph P Jackson at 11:47am June 10

See weapons of Mass Instruction, Gatto’s newest book. Also see Tapscott’s recent article at Edge on the end of the University and Neil Gershenfeld’s interview in SEED on how the MIT model is obsolete. FAB lab networks, community techshops, etc being the future. On the contrary I think the University could die faster than the state coerced system. Tuition hit 50K per year for “4 yr liberal arts undergrad” even before the financial collapse. The credentialing function is dead as soon as Web 3.0, semantic web/blog/social software mining for reputation metrics comes online, est 10yrs.

Max Marmer at 11:59am June 10

A lot of good resources here.

1) Gatto: I will check it out. However I saw him speak at Future Salon last year and while he had a lot of good ideas, I wasn’t impressed with the coherence of a solution, though he was really good at delivering anecdotes that illustrated the problem. Did you read the book? Maybe that’s better.

2) I read Tapscott’s article, it was great.

3) I will check out Gershenfeld’s article. I’m a big fan of his and it’s my intention to involve the making community in Force For the Future. It was reading Fab four years ago that inspired me to go down this route. Digital Fab owns a significant part of 21st century learning landscape, I think. Not all of it though. There are some really key startup/entrepreneurial parts I’m working on.

Max Marmer at 11:59am June 10

4) Great answers on credentialling, that’s what I’ve been feeling, but that’s a great expanation of the tools that will actually take the system down. A degree is one, very antiquated way of signaling competency, but it’s much better to prove competency with the work you actually did. Project based learning is a way people can show they have real skills and can actually contribute, not just explain how it works on tests and papers.

It’s already not the most effective way to judge talent, if you’re willing to do research for 10-20 min online and see what a person is like and what they have done, and who they surround themselves with. Just 10-20 min isn’t scalable if you have 100+ people applying for a job.

Continue reading

Share on Twitter

Changing Education: M.I.T. Takes Big Step in Right Direction

Find the original article here.

M.I.T. has just undergone a large change in the way it teaches many of it’s technical classes. The lecture format has been dropped in favor of more active approaches to learning. I believe this is undeniably a good thing.

I think there are two key changes here that this shift addresses, and one more change they would do well to incorporate. The important shifts are narrowing the breadth of the information in order to increase focus on the essential, and increasing engagement by filtering knowledge through an action oriented lens. But this approach still lacks the clear communication of why this knowledge is important in the first place. I’m not arguing that it isn’t important but communicating why it is important is an essential part in giving students the motivation to learn the material.

Narrowing Breadth

Teachers have a tendency to cram as much information as possible in the time they have rather than focusing deeply on communicating the key insights. All that information may be important but the dilution of the key principles makes the lesson overwhelming and decreases engagement and motivation.

In an article in the education journal Change last year, Dr. Wieman noted that the human brain “can hold a maximum of about seven different items in its short-term working memory and can process no more than about four ideas at once.”

“But the number of new items that students are expected to remember and process in the typical hourlong science lecture is vastly greater,” he continued. “So we should not be surprised to find that students are able to take away only a small fraction of what is presented to them in that format.”

Effective teaching needs to be consistent with how the brain actually learns. Absorbing the breadth of information that needs to be covered actually would be quite easy if the key concepts were communicated effectively first. Don’t try to understand a vast set of information by going through it in entirety once hoping the unconscious will miraculously synthesize a pattern. A much better method would involve learning the underlying pattern first. A lot of the information should now snap into place as most ideas in a class are just variations of the underlying pattern, and only require one additional step to achieve a deep understanding. But from my experience this is a major departure from how most teachers teach. There’s almost no flexibility in class because teachers have a fixed amount of curriculum they have to cover.

This has many parallels to current scientific understanding of the creative process. When the mind just tries to absorb everything and doesn’t know what it’s looking for it’s overwhelming and very little ends up being well understood. It’s like trying to write when you’re asked to write about anything. There’s simply too many things that nothing comes to mind. It’s much easier to be creative when you guidelines are defined. Creativity is working within restrictions. You need to know what to focus on. Asking clear, concise questions helps a lot. If you don’t know what you don’t understand first formulate a clear question. That narrows the confusion from a diffused feeling of understanding nothing to a specific topic that needs a little more attention.

Increasing Engagement

“There was a long tradition that what it meant to teach was to give a really well-prepared lecture,” said Peter Dourmashkin, a senior lecturer in physics at M.I.T. and a strong proponent of the new method. “It was the students’ job to figure it out… The people who wanted to understand,” Professor Mazur said, “had the discipline, the urge, to sit down afterwards and say, ‘Let me figure this out.’ ” But for the majority, he said, a different approach is needed.

When you do that you are only going to engage the very top of the class for who the material comes completely naturally. But that cuts out a huge percentage of people who are very close to developing a deep understanding but just need a little help. The school system only works for two types of people. The student who is conditioned to accept whatever they are told and will do whatever is necessary to get the good grade and get into an Ivy league school. And the student who is so passionate about a subject that they are completely driven to develop a deep understanding of the subject. But often this type of student does well in only a few subjects and becomes a very narrow minded person early on.

M.I.T is taking real steps towards make learning a more active process.

“Just as you can’t become a marathon runner by watching marathons on TV,” Professor Mazur said, “likewise for science, you have to go through the thought processes of doing science and not just watch your instructor do it.” The new approach at M.I.T. is known by its acronym, TEAL, for Technology Enhanced Active Learning.

Not surprisingly, “younger professors tend to be more enthusiastic about TEAL than veterans who have been perfecting their lectures for decades.”

Wider Applicability of Purpose

Life is long. The most important thing schools need to instill is a lifelong love of learning.  If your goal is ‘success’, and you measure it over the long haul then everything else should be secondary to instilling that motivation. We rush people through piles upon piles of information and almost never stop to tell them why they are learning all this information. We never give the breathing room for them to explore the knowledge. See what it’s useful for out in the real world. We rarely ever let them exercise creativity. School is about doing what your told and not questioning authority.

In talking with many teachers the thing that seems to be holding them back the most from becoming more creative and innovative is fear. They are afraid to give up control to the students. Not being able to predict what students will do with their time and whether they will use it wisely or laugh it off causes teachers to shake in their boots. There a few teachers who I’ve had who do have the courage to be different, and most of the time they’ve been more than rewarded with an incredibly engaged and enthusiastic class of students who look forward to coming to class and enjoy learning. How about that for a concept: Learning is fun.

The best  way I know of to increase engagement and purpose is project based learning that interacts directly with the real world. This can stimulate desire, creativity, purpose and in the process create a better world. But I’ll save that for another post.

Share on Twitter